|
Go to the State of California Home Page |
![]() |
Return to the Federal Consistency Program Home Page Contact the Federal
Consistency Coordinator
|
1. What is the California Coastal Management Program (CCMP)?
2. What is the difference between a consistency determination and a consistency certification?
3. What is the difference between a consistency determination and a negative determination?
4. How can I tell whether to submit a consistency determination or a negative determination?
9. Do I need to analyze every Chapter 3 policy in a consistency determination or certification?
10. Is there an application fee for a federal consistency submittal?
13. Who do I contact for more information?
1. Question: What is the California Coastal Management Program (CCMP)?
Answer: Coastal States prepare Coastal Management Programs under the Coastal Zone Management Act, which Congress enacted in 1972 to encourage coastal states to develop comprehensive programs to manage and balance competing uses of and impacts to coastal resources. Once the federal government approves a state's Coastal Management Program (CMP), that state gains federal consistency review authority. California's CMP was federally approved in 1977 and contains two designated coastal zone management agencies that implement the federal consistency provisions: (1) the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for all coastal areas outside San Francisco Bay; and (2) the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) for the coastal areas in San Francisco Bay. (The CCMP also includes the California Coastal Conservancy, 'which purchases, protects, restores, and enhances coastal resources, and provides access to the shore'.)
For federal consistency activities that the CCC reviews, the most important portion of the CCMP is the "enforceable policies" contained in Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act (see http://www.coastal.ca.gov/fedcd/cach3.pdf). The next most important portion of the CCMP, which describes how California implements the federal consistency provisions, is the discussion contained in "Federal Consistency and the National Interest" (Chapter 11 from the CCMP Final EIS - see http://www.coastal.ca.gov/fedcd/ccmp-ch11.pdf).
2. Question:
What is the difference between a consistency determination and a consistency
certification?
Answer: Consistency determinations are submitted by federal agencies. Consistency certifications are for projects requiring a federal permit, authorization, or funding. The legal tests, review periods, and dispute resolution mechanisms differ between the two. (See "Federal Consistency in a Nutshell for more details, at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/fedcd/guidecd.pdf.) Briefly:
Review periods: The Consistency Determination review period is up to 75 days. The Consistency Certification review period is up to 6 months. Applicants may extend either of these time periods. Note also the "90 day" rule for consistency determinations in 15 CFR §930.36(b): "The consistency determination shall be provided to State agencies at least 90 days before final approval of the Federal agency activity unless both the Federal agency and the State agency agree to an alternative notification schedule."
Legal Tests: The enforceable policy (Coastal Act Chapter 3) analysis is the same for both. Where they differ is that federally permitted projects (Consistency Certifications) must be "consistent" with the CCMP, whereas federal agency projects (Consistency Determinations) must be "consistent to the maximum extent practicable" (defined in 15 CFR §930.32 as follows: "(a)(1) The term ‘consistent to the maximum extent practicable' means fully consistent with the enforceable policies of management programs unless full consistency is prohibited by existing law applicable to the Federal agency." )
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: A CCC objection to a consistency certification may be appealed (only by the applicant) to the Secretary of Commerce. (A CCC concurrence cannot be appealed.) A CCC objection to a consistency determination is not appealable; available dispute resolutions include: (1)formal or informal mediation by the Secretary of Commerce or the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources (OCRM); and (2) litigation.
3. Question: What is the difference between a consistency determination and a negative determination?
Answer: A consistency determination is submitted when a federal agency activity affects the coastal zone. It is a project description and analysis of the activity's coastal zone effects based on the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. A negative determination is a project description and an explanation of why a federal agency has concluded that an activity does not affect the coastal zone. Chapter 3 analysis is not required for the latter.
4. Question: How can I tell whether to submit a consistency determination or a negative determination?
Answer: There are no hard and fast rules. Decisions are made on a case by case basis. If the CCC staff objects to a negative determination, then the CCC staff will request that the federal agency submit a consistency determination. To avoid potential delays, decisions on which to submit are best made in consultation with the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).
5. Question: How can I tell whether my project affects the coastal zone? If located outside the coastal zone, do I still need a federal consistency review?
Answer: Effects, rather than location, dictate whether federal consistency review is triggered. Thus, projects both inside and outside the coastal zone can trigger federal consistency review. (We will soon post links to coastal zone boundary maps.) Whether a project affects the coastal zone should be discussed with the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).
6. Question: My project is located on federal land (or in federal waters) and is a federal agency project. Do I still need a federal consistency review, even though federal land is treated as "excluded from the coastal zone" (even where the federal land is seaward of the coastal zone boundary)?
Answer: Projects on federal land (or in federal waters beyond the state's seaward coastal zone limit) can affect the coastal zone and trigger federal consistency review. The test is whether a project affects the coastal zone (see answer to previous question). The Commission reviews many consistency determinations for activities on federal land. Whether a consistency determination is required is decided on a case by case basis and should be discussed with the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below). (See also #3 and #4 above, concerning whether a negative determination or a consistency determination is required.)
7. Question: My project is located on federal land and is not a federal agency project. Do I still need a federal consistency review, even though federal land is treated as "excluded from the coastal zone" ?
Answer: You may need a CCC-issued coastal development permit for a "private activity on federal land" (typical example: a cellular tower for a communications company on a federal military base). The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) excludes from its definition of the coastal zone "lands the use of which by law is subject solely to the discretion of or which is held in trust by the Federal Government." (15 USC 1453(1)). If a federal agency leases land to a private party, the exclusion based on "subject solely to the discretion of the federal agency" may disappear and the activity may be considered to be "within the coastal zone" for purposes of CCC coastal development permit review. If the project is within the coastal zone but on federal land, contact the CCC office for your district (district contact information can be found at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/address.html.) If the project is both inside and outside the coastal zone, or fully outside the coastal zone, contact the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).
8. Question: Can a NEPA or CEQA document function as a federal consistency submittal? Do I have to submit a draft or final NEPA or CEQA document with my consistency submittal?
Answer: NEPA/CEQA documents are not legally required. See 15 CFR § 930.37, 'which provides:'
A Federal agency may use its NEPA documents as a vehicle for its consistency determination or negative determination under this subpart. However, a Federal agency's federal consistency obligations under the Act are independent of those required under NEPA and are not necessarily fulfilled by the submission of a NEPA document. State agencies shall not require Federal agencies to submit NEPA documents as information required pursuant to §930.39. If a Federal agency includes its consistency determination or negative determination in a NEPA document, the Federal agency shall ensure that the NEPA document includes the information and adheres to the timeframes required by this subpart. Federal agencies and State agencies should mutually agree on how to best coordinate the requirements of NEPA and the Act.
15 CFR § 930.39 and § 930.58 describe the consistency determination and consistency certification information requirements. In practice, NEPA/CEQA documents have sometimes included chapters or appendices that contain specific federal consistency (i.e., Coastal Act Chapter 3) analyses, but any such federal consistency submittal needs a cover letter to the CCC clearly identifying that the NEPA/CEQA document contains such an analysis, and where in the document it can be found. Also, environmental analyses contained in NEPA/CEQA documents can be referenced in federal consistency submittals, where they can be used to supplement the analysis of a project's consistency with the applicable Coastal Act Chapter 3 policy.
9. Question: Do I need to analyze every Chapter 3 policy in a consistency determination or certification?
Answer: No, you only need to analyze those policies applicable to the proposal. For advice on which policies to analyze, contact the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).
10. Question: Is there an application fee for a federal consistency submittal?
Answer: There is no fee for a consistency determination submitted by a federal agency for a federal agency activity. There is a fee for a consistency certification submitted by an applicant for federal permits. The fee is the same as the Commission requires for coastal development permits.
11. Question:
Is there a standard application form for a consistency determination, negative
determination, or consistency certification?
Answer: No. You may use any format you choose, as long as the information requirements are satisfied (see answer to question #8 above). Feel free to use our "sample" consistency determination, negative determination, or consistency certification formats at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/fedcd/fedcndx.html for guidance (and/or contact the CCC federal consistency coordinator).
12. Question: I need a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit (or one of the other "listed" CCMP permits) AND one of the following applies:
I have already received (or have applied for) a coastal development permit from the Coastal Commission. Do I need to submit a consistency certification?a)
No. Once a Coastal Commission-reviewed coastal development permit has been issued, that permit automatically satisfies federal consistency, and no further submittal is needed.Answer:
b) I have already received (or have applied for) a coastal development permit from the local government that issues such permits under its certified Local Coastal Program. Do I need to submit a consistency certification?
he Corps of Engineers will need evidence of compliance with the CCMP. You will need CCC concurrence with a consistency certification or a CCC staff-issued waiver of the federal consistency provisions. In many instances where local permits are appealable to the CCC (which is often the case for activities needing Corps of Engineers permits), the federal consistency unit will issue a waiver. If you seek such a waiver, you should submit a map, project description, and local government permit conditions and findings (or a timetable for local government review if it has not been completed) to the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).Answer: T
c) I have been informed that I am exempt from the need for a coastal development permit (CDP) from the local government that issues such permits under its certified Local Coastal Program (examples – repair and maintenance exemptions, de minimis waivers). Do I still need to submit a consistency certification? What if the CDP waiver was issued by the CCC?
The Corps of Engineers will need evidence of compliance with the CCMP. You will need CCC concurrence with a consistency certification or a CCC staff-issued waiver of the federal consistency provisions. If you seek such a waiver, you should submit a map, project description, and the local government's rationale for issuing a permit exemption (such as a written copy of a waiver and/or local government contact information) to the CCC's federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).Answer:
d) My project qualifies for a Nationwide Permit (NWP) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Do I still need to submit a consistency certification? If so, why?
Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permits (NWP) are treated the same as all other Corps of Engineers permits, and the CCC's programmatic objection to the Corps' consistency determination for the NWP permit program describes the effect of the objection as follows:Answer:
An objection to the Corps' proposed NWP program will not eliminate Nationwide Permits in the California coastal zone. Instead, it will maintain an existing procedure used by the Commission which requires federal consistency review of the activity before a NWP can apply to a specific activity. Depending on the circumstances, the Commission can either waive consistency certification or require a consistency certification.
Therefore, you will need evidence of compliance with the CCMP, as described in the answer to the previous two questions. (This applies even for "non-reporting" NWPs that do not require notification to the Corps of Engineers.)
e) My project qualifies for an emergency coastal development permit. Do I need to submit a consistency certification?
Possibly, depending on whether the emergency permit is issued by the CCC or by local government. See answers to #13 a) and #b) above.Answer:
f) My project is located in one of the following ports: Port of San Diego, Long Beach, Los Angeles, or Port Hueneme. The permitting agency (i.e., the Port) has determined the project consistent with the CCC-certified Port Master Plan (PMP). Do I need to submit a consistency certification?
Probably not; activities consistent with a certified Port Master Plan are "deemed consistent" (similar to CCC-issued coastal development permits – see #13 a) above). However, if there are any questions about whether a project is consistent with a PMP, or if any part of the project would occur outside the designated port boundaries, further CCC federal consistency and/or coastal development permit review may be needed. Contact the CCC's 'federal consistency coordinator (contact information below).Answer:
13. Question: Who do I contact for more information?
Answer: For more information, please contact the CCC's federal consistency coordinator, Larry Simon, at lsimon@coastal.ca.gov or by FAX at (415) 904-5400 or by phone at (415) 904-5288. If you have questions about any of the following types of projects - energy projects, aquaculture, artificial reefs, offshore fiber optic cables, or desalination facilities - contact Alison Dettmer, Manager of the CCC's Energy and Ocean Resources Unit, at adettmer@coastal.ca.gov. (Note: energy projects include oil and gas leasing, exploration and production, liquefied natural gas import terminals, oil and gas pipelines, oil marine terminals, wave, wind, and power plants.